- #Do not copy systems and administrators permission on emcopy free#
- #Do not copy systems and administrators permission on emcopy windows#
Use the mkdir command to create directories. Use rm -fR /playground, userdel user01, and groupdel groupA to remove the resources.
When you've completed the article and learned the techniques I've covered, delete the two user accounts, the groups, and the playground directory. You are ready to work with the commands and concepts below. In your home directory, create a new directory named playground: # mkdir playgroundĬhange into the ~/playground directory by using the cd command. Note: You would use the passwd user01 command to set the user's password. Note that you do not need to configure passwords for the users in this exercise, as you won't log on with those accounts.
It's best to do this on a virtual machine rather than your personal Linux box, but these tasks are relatively harmless.Ĭreate two new users and two new groups to work with. You can use the following commands to set up a playground. With that in mind, I'll assume you have a couple of identities and resources to experiment with as you read the rest of the article. That means that the things that I write are usually structured as some sort of lab or other hands-on opportunity. I've been in IT for about 25 years, and most of that time was spent as a technical trainer.
#Do not copy systems and administrators permission on emcopy free#
Free eBook: Boost hybrid cloud security.Free eBook: Simplify your security ops center.Free eBook: Improve security and compliance.
There is about as much probability losing files in a file copy as find out that a block based image can't be moved on to the storage medium you are copying to. It is disingenuous to assume a block copy is vastly superior to other methods. Also the tools are fairly useless if you have any reason to change the block sizes. The fact that most of the tools you listed have started to prefer file based imaging (exception being dd)now should also indicate that block copies are not the "end all, be all" of a copy anyway. Not well supported? Come on, never heard of Ghost, or hell, dd? Wut? Yes it is, when was the last time you forgot a file with Ghost, Clonezilla or Macrium, that is the whole point of the tooling. Block copies also isn't well supported and losing a block is more damaging than loosing a file. To be fair, a block copy isn't guaranteed either and I would tend to guess that the success / failure rate isn't much different than a DFS-R replication copy. If you want to be 100% sure, like the OP mentioned, do a block copy of the volume. Then you will never need to migrate a file server again.ĭFS-R is nice, but has the same caveats as the other tools. Then might as well create a DFS root and publish the servers. On the 2003 box, if I move up a level and hit properties on that folder, it reports 127 files. Here are two screenshots that illustrate some of the discrepancies in the counts: 2003 2012R2.
#Do not copy systems and administrators permission on emcopy windows#
It looks like 20R2's Windows Explorers are just enumerating the files/folders differently and counting or not counting some unusual files based on file/pathnames or some other attribute, and that I'm good, but I don't like to assume. The program Beyond Compare shows no difference in the folder or file structures. They don't always match, though.įor a given share, I get four different sets numbers depending on how I compare the drives.Ģ003 Share, file properties viewed on 2003 server: 148,515 files, 11,480 folders, 84,117,690,808 bytesĢ003 Share, file properties viewed on 2012R2 server: 148,539 files, 11,479 folders, 84,130,467,511 bytesĢ012R2 Share, file properties viewed on 2012R2 server: 148,862 files, 11,492 folders, 84,376,956,135 bytes Usually, I'll use Windows Explorer to pull up the folder properties and verify that the folder, file, and byte counts are the same. Do you just trust robocopy if it doesn't report any errors? What I'm curious about is how everyone verifies that you actually have 100% complete (not 99.99%), accurate copies of everything.
I've had some issues with permissions (UAC on 2012R2 being a pain in the ass and wanting to add an explicit ACL to everything I look at) and long file names/directories. I'm migrating a fileserver from 2003 to 2012R2 now, via Robocopy.
0 kommentar(er)
